In the wild they appear as two extremes - while the chimpanzees are
almost the only carnivores (among the monkeys) who, like humans, hunt
in groups and with self-made spears, the bonobos prefer peace. They
settle conflicts over the act of procreation and keep their own dead
within the community. In the picture, the striking affinity of the
chimpanzee with humans is demonstrated, among other things, by similar
sexual behavior (kissing, sexual intercourse). The literal 'charm' of
bonobos is evident in numerous painted couples snuggling close
together, but also in
mothers with young animals
who play and hug each other. A difference between apes and humans seems
to be completely eliminated in the design of the yellow
proboscis monkeys,
whose faces the painter made almost human. In addition, they structure
the image field in rows one behind the other, which play through
different postures and thus call up popular evolution graphics (left
half of the image, middle / bottom).
So it should already be clear from the previous considerations: All figures in this picture are one! It is not only the
subject of primates that integrates man into the animal kingdom, which is to be seen, but a
visible evolution
in different stages. Flora and fauna, various animal classes and the
prehistoric transition from marine to land animals are also included,
as well as life-threatening enemies on the one hand, and reproduction
and fertility on the other. So it is not simply 'Affenliebe' as blind affection that
demonstrates
human figuration in the picture, but precisely this
fertility of cyclical life.
That's why OtGO's typical human figures are minimalist, naked,
hairless, but clearly recognizable by their gender characteristics.
Numerous mothers with children can be made out. All figures show
themselves in a variety of ways frontally, from the side and as back
figures in all possible poses. Some have elongated limbs, dizzyingly
slim waists and large feet, resembling models on the catwalk. But what
are the human figures actually doing in the picture? According to their
postures, one can guess that they are geared towards reproduction. The
bodies with the splayed extremities do not only perform movements that
at best resemble yoga asanas (for example the 'dog'), gymnastics
(handstand) or expressive dance elements (jumps). Your stretches and
splits could also appear in an hour of pelvic floor or pregnancy
exercises. In addition, the above-mentioned 'layering of figures',
their combinations and touches, as well as an obvious point in the
image inspired by the Kama Sutra (top right) also allow the viewer further chains of association.
The deviations that distinguish the
second painting Kingdom of the Apes
(2021, 2/3, 160 x 150 cm) from the first may be less striking when
viewed from a distance than those in the third painting. But on closer
inspection, the
structure of the second painting is also noticeably different. The
background of the picture experiences a stronger compression, individual
layers of paint
can be separated less. This is also due to the painting style, which is
more informal, and more crusts of paint become visible in the streak of light through overpainting. The
inner picture frame is missing, so that the rainforest is able to proliferate here beyond the picture borders. The rows of yellow
proboscis monkeys mark the
picture field in wide arcs like seams or scars, and swarms of purple rays and a large
proportion of finely structured, yellow and red foliage structure the
picture.
The
coloring here is
determined by the mixed colors orange and violet, in addition to the
primary colors yellow and red. Deep ultramarine blue complements the
new color distribution. There is also this concentration on the level
of
figuration: Figures are
even more 'pushed' one on top of the other, appear 'clumped together'
and are 'mixed up' across species. For example, an orange
orangutan
in the midst of a network of nasal monkey tails and rays no longer
knows what happens to him when he is embraced by five bonobos and three
people at the same time and thus literally 'besieged' (upper right
picture).
The same type of monkey can also be seen in the picture, the contrary
'defiguration processes', as these figures become
'permeable'
through the thin glazes for the underlying layers of foliage, as if
they were threatening to disappear again in the jungle. This can
definitely be seen as a sideswipe at species extinction and threatened
animal species! Even more often, however, 'figure overlays' fragment
the bodies in the picture. Other
animal figures experience a 'redistribution': fewer
zebras are used, but the aquatic animals are reinforced.
Tadpoles teeming with the
rays, again animals that indicate a certain stage of development (larva of the anurans).
Once again the painter worked out the
monkeys
among the shown primates in more detail than the humans using contours
and internal structures. Nevertheless, there are not as many
differentiable species as in the first picture. OtGO focused on the
larger species and isolated individuals. There are also monkeys that
are painted in shades of blue, but cannot be clearly identified based
on their body shape. A new species appears -
purple-colored, female hybrid beings, which have just as voluminous bodies as most female figures, but instead have a monkey head and more or less fur.
In the case of
chimpanzees and
bonobos,
red figures appear in addition to the black ones. A 'tipping point' in
the representation reveals itself when these monkeys carry human
children in front of them in an all too human manner, as if they wanted
to bring them (think of their respective nature) either to
the baptism or to the sacrificial table. The
gorillas
are generally gray-green again - except for one individual who stands
out from the others in terms of color and size: a truly regal gorilla
male, whose light blue-gray coloring identifies a
silverback.
Light yellow speckles of color cover the fur, give it shine and
remind one of constellations. Larger orange dots surround the head like
a nimbus or a crown and radiate auratically to the side. Two yellow
proboscis monkeys
sit on his shoulders and two human figures lie and kneel at his feet,
as if he deserved their honor. The gorilla king is in a significant
position at the bottom of the picture diagonal - as the antagonist of a
magnificent
tiger (top right), who embodies a solitary
enemy of the primates.
The big cat seems to be walking according to the sequence of
steps, but turns its body axis in order to fix the viewer directly from
the picture by looking over the shoulder. For a moment you could think
you got into a film still with Shere Khan. And one remembers - also in
the
kingdom of the apes it is
up to the regent to offer his followers protection against rivals and
other enemies, otherwise he would be abandoned. A second remarkable
figure constellation connects this
monkey king
with a female monkey figure in his immediate surroundings (in the
picture on the right, shifted upwards by the male gorilla). Body shape
and orange fur color are peculiar to the orangutans in this picture.
However, its size, the oversized 'gripping hands' with the long fingers
stretched out in a dramatic gesture and the wilted breasts make this
female appear as a grotesque counter-figure to the male gorilla.
Although his gaze goes in their direction, the two make a strangely
composed royal couple!